Caroni – I agree with Verano that your post is a wonderful summary. For me the bit that stands out is “And the authors acknowledge that since diets were measured only at the start of the trial and six years later, dietary patterns could have changed over the subsequent 19 years” . So – the results are pure fiction rather than fact.
The BBC says “After following the group for an average of 25 years, researchers found that those who got 50-55% of their energy from carbohydrates (the moderate carb group and in line with UK dietary guidelines) had a slightly lower risk of death compared with the low and high-carb groups.”. I think the operative word here is they had a “slightly” lower risk of death compared with the low and high carb groups. So they hadn’t a clue for the 19 years whether people really followed a low carb or not. I researchers seem to be prone to this sort of fiction.
I do also have to take issue with the words in the report – they had a slightly lower risk of death. Surely the risk of death is 100%. Don’t they mean a slightly lower risk of premature death. Sorry for being so pedantic. Am doing admin and it is “doing my head in”. Am off for a doggie walk to clear my head.